what is editing – glossing over a few cracks or a full-blown makeover?

room3

My sister is visiting  at the end of the week – yeh hey :)  She’ll be sleeping in my daughter’s old bedroom. The thing is, the room looked pretty shabby so I decided to give it a bit of a freshen up. At first I was just going to give the walls a lick of paint but the carpet was so shot, I decided to pull it up and dump it. That meant new flooring. Luckily, there was a special offer at Floors4u and I’ve got this great wooden floor to lay,  just as soon as I’ve finished painting. As I was changing the floor, I thought I may as as well do the ceiling – there’s been a huge crack in it forever which badly needed fixing. Suddenly, it’s Tuesday, I’m still painting and plastering and the room looks will it will never be ready and I am wondering why I ever started! Fortunately, a couple of hours ago the calvary arrived in the shape of my daughter. Phew! Together we’ll get the room finished and it’ll look great – and worth all the effort :)

room1 What has decorating got to do with editing? Well, freshening up a bedroom is not unlike editing a story… you put it off and put it off because, frankly, it’s a hassle. Then when you finally start,  you’re just looking to tidy up the odd spelling mistake and misplaced comma. But, little by little, you realise the story is full of cracks – and there is no helpful daughter on a ladder to assist you. You are tempted to gloss over the cracks, after all, they’re not that bad, are they? But the more you look, they more you know you can’t ignore the tired sentences; the iffy plot that doesn’t quite work; the monotonous paragraphs that drag the writing down; the two dimensional characters that are flat and wooden, yes, wooden!  You face your fears and start digging out the rot and mending the mistakes. It will probably take much longer than you anticipated and you will wonder why you started – more than once. You will be miserable. But eventually you will be done and it will be worth it because editing is your last chance to be truthful to yourself and to make your story as good as it can be, to make it great :)

If you are a reader, can you remember coming across ‘cracks’ in stories? Did they put you off? Do you think there are more cracks in stories nowadays? If you are a writer, do you agree with me? How important is editing to you?

photo

 

 

Posted in General | Tagged , | 8 Comments

Is the novella making a comeback?


images When it comes to books I keep reading that bigger is better and shorter, as in a novella, is inferior and unpopular:

“For me the word denotes a lesser genre. If you pitch a book to a bookseller as a novel, you’re likely to get more orders than if you call it a novella.” Karolina Sutton (Curtis Brown Literary Agency)

“The novella has fallen into disuse because it sounds like a patronising diminutive – without the scope of a novel or the discipline of a short story.” Claire Armistead (Books editor, The Guardian)

200px-Black-water-joyce-carol-oates But are shorter books really inferior to chunky doorstops? In the past there have been heaps of great novellas, each with the scope of any novel  …

 Of Mice and Men by John SteinebeckA Clockwork Orange by Anthony Burgess,  Joseph Conrad‘s Heart of Darkness,  H. G.Wells’ The Time Machine,  George Orwell‘s Animal Farm,  Joyce Carol Oates‘s Black WaterErnest Hemingway‘s The Old Man and the See, Robert Louis Stevenson‘s The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde and Shirley Jackson’s We Have Always Lived In The Castle …

Curiousincidentofdoginnighttime-1 And more recently we’ve had  The Curious
Incident of the Dog in the night by Mark Haddon, and  Julian Barnes’  The Sense of an Ending, which won the Booker Prize in 2011! I’ve also noticed that more and more e-books are novella length. Do you know any others?

 

200px-The_Sense_of_an_Ending Is it possible the novella is making a bit of a come-back? What do you think?  Are you getting a tad fed up with weighty doorstops? When it comes to reading do you refer a chunky door stop of a book, or a slender volume, or don’t you care as long as it’s a good story well told?

As always, it’d be great to hear from you :)

Posted in General | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 18 Comments

Do writers have a social responsibility to contribute to and change the world they live in?


ruth Writers tell stories. And good writers tell good stories well. Our very own guest blogger, Ruth Hunt, asks if this is enough. Should writers also have a social responsibility? What do you think? Whether you are a writer or a reader, we would love to hear from you :)

Over to Ruth ….

What do you feel writers can contribute to society? Jeanette Winterson author of  ‘Oranges are not the only Fruit’ recently spoke about the writers role within society to The Believer magazine. She wrote:

imgres ‘That’s why everybody who has a chance to make even the smallest difference – whether you influence one person or many people, whether you change something in your neighbourhood or you change something at a bigger level…

And writing books isn’t separate by the way. I do think the writer or the artist has to live in the world, fully participate in it. This isn’t ivory-tower stuff. It’s about blvrsubs_new being in the world that we’ve got and contributing to it and trying to change it.’ (Jeanette Winterson interviewed by
Andrea Tetrick page 52 in The Believer Magazine March/April 2013. www.believermag.com)

When I was first thinking about this question, I thought it was clear cut. I thought that as long as I was writing original material, which was factually correct where it needed to be, that I didn’t perpetuate stereotypes and that my characters were believable, this was enough.  This is where my responsibilities were at and where they ended. However, I read the interview with Jeanette Winterson and thought about what she was saying. She was talking about the writer as an artist, and what should our responsibilities should be politically or socially. I think she was also reaching out to writers to consider what we are writing in terms of the impact our work has. Does it increase understanding about an issue or does it reinforce stereotypes?

It was then that I realised, hang on, if as writers we are writing about characters imagined or real, social problems are everywhere. Now I once heard somebody debate this, but what they argued was ‘This is fine for writers in China or Sri Lanka but if you are a Western writer, there isn’t any real social issue.’ I can think of racism, sexism, child abuse. I could say poverty, mental illness, illiteracy, or I might point to gangs, drugs and guns. Indeed, scratch under the surface and every social problem or issue is present.

A precise description of the social novel is:

‘A work of fiction in which a prevailing social problem such as gender, race, class prejudice are dramatized through its effect on the characters in the novel.’ (Encyclopaedia Britannica Online Academic edition 2012)

url Examples of ‘the social novel’ can be seen as early as the 19th Century with novels like Harriet Beecher Stowes anti slavery novel, Uncle Tom’s Cabin (1892). Another example is Charles Dickens novel, ‘Hard Times.’

As we look back on these novels, an accusation that is often repeated is how do these writers, who were white and often middle class/ upper-class, know about these issues? How could they possibly feel what it is like to experience those problems?

url-1

I don’t think that is totally fair, at least these writers tried to make a difference. We can only write about the time we know about. The belief that unless you have lived through the social injustice, or know about the issues and problems from a personal perspective is one which means writers are put off from even attempting to do anything related to the subject.

However, time and time again, I come across great writers who have done a lot of research and have written a ‘social novel’ for the world now.

url-1 Dave Eggers is just one example. His novel Zeitoun (Published by McSweeney’s in 2009 ) tells the story Zeitoun Abdulrahman who got caught up in a nightmare of a situation following Hurricane Katrina.

Zeitoun is described by The Toronto Globe and Mail as …

‘A damning indictment of governmental and judicial failings in the wake of Katrina – but beyond that, it recounts a wrenching, human story of family, faith and ultimately, hope.’

Dave Eggers didn’t experience Hurricane Katrina himself, but he did do a lot of research which paid off.

His latest book  ‘A Hologram for the King’ deals with the economic crisis and recession. (Published by Hamish Hamilton, February 2013).

001

Dave Eggers also contributes to society in another way, he founded ‘826 Valencia’ which uses writers who have spare time to help teach on a one to one basis with in the local community. There is an English equivalent in London ‘The Ministry of Stories’ co-founded by Nick Hornby. In an interview with The Guardian newspaper Dave Eggers said:

‘But sitting in your Garage writing, or pretending to write… sometimes makes you feel a little useless. Sometimes you feel like getting out in the world and seeing if you can be useful in some more immediate or tangible way.’

http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2013/jan/26/dave-eggers-hologram-king-interview

This illustrates how writers can participate in society, and contribute to society. Even if you don’t have the funds to open a writing school in your community, simply through your fiction you can make a difference. After all, in fiction we create a landscape and world for our readers including our invented characters. Does this charge us to show the diversity of the world? Surely fiction means we imagine a life other than our own?

Does this give us a better understanding of people and the wider world? Is this one of the purposes of fiction, that it can bridge the gaps between people who have different backgrounds and experiences? Is the end result a novel which could help promote compassion, empathy and understanding amongst readers?

I believe a novel can shape events, and allow a reader to grasp the issue or injustice. A fiction writer could shine a torch onto an issue rather than deflecting the light away. What do you think?

What would the world have lost if the social novel wasn’t here? What would the world be like if great writers hadn’t chosen to change the world through their fiction and through their actions?

Dave Eggers’ wish: Once Upon a School

Posted in General | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 27 Comments

calling all women writers (and readers)

I was recently invited to write a guest post ( Let Me Tell you Why I Write) on the very excellent online writing magazine Women Writers, Women Books.

Screen Shot 2013-04-28 at 11.55.45

Women Writers, Women, Books is an online literary magazine by and about contemporary women writers.

Women Writers, Women, Books at www.booksbywomen.org was launched in 2011 to be another platform for contemporary women writers and authors around the world writing in English. Our mission is to encourage and promote the visibility of women writers. We are particularly interested in the edges, the intersections between genres, nationalities, languages, arts, cultures… We are interested in giving opportunities to unknown writers to be published, as well as publishing posts by well known authors. Though the website name is booksbywomen.org, contributors do not have to have published a book, or even be writing a book to be considered. The only criteria is that she be a woman who writes, and that her post be written for our audience specifically, that it be well-written and interesting to read.

If you are a woman writer, submitting your work to Women Writers, Womens Books is an opportunity for you see your writing published in a reputable online magazine. If you are a reader, there is cornucopia of writing in the magazine for you to enjoy :)

Do you think there are enough opportunities for women writers to see their work in print – both digitally and in paper? Is an online magazine, such as  Women Writers, Womens Books, still necesarry in 2013 – not forgetting that only last week Wikipedia bumped women from the ‘American novelists’ category, relegating them to a subcategory and clearing space for an all-male main page:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2013/apr/25/wikipedia-women-american-novelists?CMP=twt_gu

As always, I would love to hear from you,  so do please leave a comment :)

Oh, and if you want to know why I write, do click on the link … http://booksbywomen.org/let-me-tell-you-why-i-write-marianne-wheelaghan/

desk1

Posted in General | Tagged , | 4 Comments

“Amazon thinks the cities that are most ‘well-read’ are the cities that bought the most stuff from them.”

What happens  in the book world in the US, usually happens in the UK book world next. Here’s an article by Rachel Smalter Hall in Book Riot about an Amazon press release, which lists the “best read” cities in the US (according to Amazon). Should we be worried when Amazon make such statements? As always, it would be great to know what you think :)

“If You Didn’t Buy It From Amazon It Doesn’t Count as Reading, Says Amazon.”

BOOK RIOT

“Book Riot is dedicated to the idea that writing about books and reading should be just as diverse as books and readers are … and the  only thing we like as much as books is talking about books with other readers …”

 http://bookriot.com/2013/04/26/if-you-didnt-buy-it-from-amazon-it-doesnt-count-as-reading-says-amazon/

Posted in General | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

“As long as there is a good story, there will be a book …” True or false?

books

In today’s  Huffington Post (Books) there’s an interview about the future of the book in print form with film director Vivienne Roumaani of the independent movie, “Out of Print.”  Narrated by Meryl Streep, the film will be making its debut at the Tribeca Film Festival in New York City on April 25.

“As long as there is a good story, there will be a book,” says Vivienne Roumani.

Do you agree with her?

Follow the link for the full interview …

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/24/out-of-print-film_n_3148166.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000003

 

 

 

 

Posted in General | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

If you write a bestseller or have your book made into a movie, you’ll never have to work again – true or false?

entertainment

“If you write a bestseller or have your book made into a movie, you’ll never have to work again, or so the myth goes…”

In case you missed it,  here’s a link to an excellent article in today’s Huffington Post by the writer Sara Sheridan about the truth behind what writers earn.  If you want to know the answer to the question, you’ll have to read the article ;o)

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/sara-sheridan/writers-earnings-cultural-myth_b_3136859.html?utm_hp_ref=tw

 

 

Posted in General | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Who are the mysterious Super Book Reviewers?

82a5889c97305ae40949250c748723d2 “Today, the publishing industry survives on super reviewers – book worms who read far more than most Americans, and who tell their friends what to read as well.”

This quote is taken from the  Atlantic Magazine. It refers to the US but what happens in the book world there is usually very similar to here in the UK. The article reveals that 19% of people do 79% of all the book reading, and these people tell the rest of us what to read via reviews on sites like Amazon and Goodreads.  What an incredible statistic!  BUT despite the huge influence these 19% of Super Reviewers have over our book buying choices, most readers and writers know very little about them. So, I am delighted to introduce you to Amazon Top 500 Reviewer Ignite –  AKA  Kath Middleton – who has agreed to answer some of my questions about being a Super Reviewer.  And, as you know, we always LOVE to hear from you so do ask  if you have any of your own questions :)

Picture 14

Picture 25

Me: You are an Amazon top 500 reviewer, for those who don’t know what that means, can you explain?

Kath: Amazon encourages reviews of all their products, not just books. When I bought my kindle I began to read lots of books by self-published authors – often called ‘indies’. I noticed that people left reviews and I often consulted these, as well as the product description, when I was choosing a book to read. After a while, I felt I might as well leave reviews of my own – my opinions were just as valid! Reviewers are given a ranking which depends not on how many reviews they have left, but on how helpful those reviews have been. When a potential reader clicks the button to say a review has been (or hasn’t been) helpful, it affects the review’s ranking. So Top 500 means amongst the 500 most helpful reviewers.

Me: When did you write your first book review?

Kath: I had to go and check! July 2011.

Me: What makes a good read for you?

Kath: I like a book to draw me in – both to the story and to the characters. I like it to be believable – on its own level. For example, I’m fond of the fantasy genre but I allow myself to believe in the magic, the creatures, the other world or whatever it is – as long as it’s true to itself and its own rules. I really like to care about the people in the story. I don’t have to like everyone and sometimes books that I’ve really loved have shown me a flawed character that I’ve grown to care about. I love it when there are several sub-plots too and they interweave. I’m in awe of authors who can do this, and have everything arrive at the right place at the end of the book!

Me: What would put you off reviewing a book and/or giving it a negative review?

Kath: I generally choose books I think I’ll like so I don’t give too many negative reviews. However, you don’t do the author any favours by being bland about it. If there’s a problem with the story, the grammar, the characters or – I really don’t like wooden dialogue! – then I have to say so. Nothing puts me off giving a less than favourable review but I don’t enjoy doing it. However, I have had authors contact me afterwards to thank me for them, and say they’ve had a book edited, for example. The result can be a better book – and we all win.

Me: How do you choose which books to review and do you have a favourite genre?

Kath: I choose books I like the sound of. I love fantasy, thrillers, some crime novels, horror, some that are simply a bit quirky and appeal to me. I rarely fancy chick-lit and I think humour is difficult – it’s so subjective. When I know a writer has tickled my funny-bone in the past I’ll buy the next book but I often feel dismayed when the blurb says, ‘side splittingly funny’. That’s for me to decide, not the author to tell me! I choose my books from reader and author forums, taking the blurb and the reviews into account. I also take notice of fellow readers’ recommendations, especially those who I know have enjoyed the same books I have in the past.

I see myself as a reader who reviews, though, rather than a reviewer. There are forums which have sections where authors can offer free copies of books in exchange for a review. I’ve never gone down that route. I feel it makes me more impartial that I choose what I read.

imgres Me: How long does it take you to read a book?

Kath: I’m retired so I have more time to read than I used to have. I generally finish a book within 3 or 4 days but it can depend on other factors – like if we have visitors or there’s a lot to be done on the allotment!

Me: What qualities does a good book reviewer need?

Kath: You need to read analytically I feel. Reviewing has made me pay more attention and if I find I’ve been drifting (not always a bad book, sometimes just a tired reader!) I’ll go back over a page or two. You also have to be impartial. Sometimes an author comes over as a lovely person but if the story, the writing the grammar and punctuation are poor, as can happen with self-published work, it can spoil the experience and you have to be fair to everyone. I also try to go out into the big world of Amazon and try new authors. It’s easy to get stuck in your cosy world of ‘authors I love’.

Me: How many books have you reviewed in total?

Kath: I think it’s coming up to 260 at the moment.

Me: Wow! That is a lot! What is the best thing about being a reviewer?

Kath: Oh what a hard question! I like to do it because it gives an aim and purpose to my reading other than simple enjoyment. I like to feel that if I’ve enjoyed a book I can help to point other readers to it – to share the enjoyment. Posting a review somewhere also help me to remember the details of a book which particularly drew me (or put me off) so that if I’m asked by friends to recommend something I can go back and look at my reviews and choose.

Me: What is worst thing about being a reviewer?

Kath: Upsetting an author is horrid. It must be nasty to read a bad review of your book. However, I can’t see any point in not being honest. Apart from anything else, it devalues the good reviews.

It’s also not pleasant to be attacked for having favourite authors. It happens. It’s weird. I have favourite foods so why not favourite authors? I would hope that my reviews would explain what I like about their work but there’s always someone who will have a downer on you for it.

Me: There appears to be little or no money to be had from reviewing books, if this is the case, why do you do it?

Kath: I imagine someone, somewhere, is making money from it, but I do it because I enjoy it. I actually feel if I got paid for reviews it would be harder to be impartial. Anyway, I do a lot of other things without being paid! I’m one of life’s natural amateurs!

Me: What advice would you give to an aspiring book reviewer starting out?

Kath: Ask yourself a few questions before you write your first review. Obviously, did I enjoy the book? Why? Did I like the story? Did I like the characters, or at least, feel they were believable? Do I feel the author’s passion for the subject? (I can’t enjoy a lukewarm book!) Did I like the writing style – this is rather subjective. Personally I love creative phrases. I like someone to tell me something in an unusual fashion, so it throws a new light on it or makes me see it in a different way. Other readers may well feel this is superfluous prose and should be chopped out. If I say I like this aspect of the book, then the potential readers can decide if it’s a pro or a con for them. People often say that a review is just one person’s opinion. It’s not much of an opinion to say ‘This book is brilliant,’ or ‘This book is rubbish’. Always give reasons. And of course – choose your books wisely!

Me: Oops, nearly forgot … Can you see a time when Amazon Top Reviewers (and other reviewers like the top 500) will remove completely the need for the paid literary/newspaper book critic?

Kath: Not really. I think they are used by different people. I rarely choose a book based on a newspaper review. Most of the books I read are by indie authors anyway, and the newspaper reviewers don’t bother with them. They are missing some belters!

For some great book recommendations, you can find Kath’s excellent reviews on her blog  http://ignitebooks.blogspot.co.uk.

A huge thanks again to Kath for answering my questions.

Bookworms

(photo of soft toy bookworms with thanks via Flickr and thomaspetermueller)

(photo of Wonder Women and Batman reading via Pinterest and the American Library Association)

Posted in General | Tagged , , , , , , | 21 Comments

Food of Ghosts is ranked 8th (!!!!!!!!) in the US Amazon Free Kindle Store for Crime

 

Picture 2 This morning Food of Ghosts was ranked  8th in the Amazon US Free Kindle store for Crime! While I’m not sure how offering a Kindle book free for a day (which is what happened yesterday) can boost  ”sales”, I am assured by publisher Pilrig Press that it does and that this is VERY GOOD!

And, if you scroll down, you’ll also see that Food of Ghosts also ranked 88th in the Amazon  UK Free Kindle store for Crime, which is also pretty blooming amazing!  So, this is to say a HUGE  THANK  YOU to all who have bought/downloaded/spread the word about Food of Ghosts! :) :)

 
Picture 2

 

 

Picture 4

 

Picture 5

 

 

Posted in General | 10 Comments

How You Can Use Your Reading Experience to Shape Your Writing

Author Photo Please welcome guest blogger FC Malby, whose debut novel, Take Me to the Castle, published in December 2012, won The People’s Book Awards.

F.C. Malby lives in Vienna but grew up in East Anglia and has taught English in London, the Czech Republic, and in slum communities in the Philippines. She was a teacher and a wedding photographer before beginning to write. Her short story, The Bench, was published March 2013, and her short fiction has been long-listed in The New Writer Annual Prose and Poetry Awards and will soon be published online at the Puffin Review and the Flash Flood Journal.  As always, we’d love to hear from you so please do leave a comment :)

How You Can Use Your Reading Experience to Shape Your Writing?

Ian McEwan reads for as many hours a day as he writes and its impact can been seen in his writing and in his ability to build characters and inform the reader. Authors are generally also voracious readers and will devour books in a range of genres. This will subconsciously filter into an author’s writing but how can you use it to consciously shape your writing and inform your work?

Characters

Think about the characters you have become attached to in some of your favourite novels and try to dig down into the roots of the character’s needs and desires. Try to work out why they resonated with you as a reader and use this to feed into your character profiles.

Hook

Which books have you struggled to put down? How has the author held your attention and had you turning the pages (or scrolling through) until the small hours? Finding an effective hook in a story is the linchpin of a good novel. Without it, there is nothing to hang the rest of the story on and build the story arc. Find ways of building anticipation and suspense through good mystery or thriller writers, especially if this is your genre.

Genre

It is good advice to read outside your genre to stretch your thinking but it is also important to read inside your genre and to learn about the text structures, language, plot devices, style and the mechanics of the writing. This can then be transferred to your own writing. If you write literary fiction, reading books which have a rich style of language which captivates and hauls you in can be particularly helpful. Soak up the work of writers who will help you to raise your game.

Learn from what doesn’t work

Find out what does not work in books which you have struggled to read. Are there any books which you have read where you struggled to get past the first chapter? Look at where you have come unstuck and try to work out why. Try to think about what could be improved and how, and then use this to tighten your work.

Inspiration

Read as much as you can from a diversity of sources: books, journals, newspapers, blogs, websites and periodicals. Read good non-fiction as well as fiction and use what you read to inspire both ideas and styles. Look at what grabs your attention and what stays with you long after you have stopped reading and build it into your own work.

Knowledge

Research has shown that when children read extensively they become better writers. If this is true for new readers, imagine how much more it applies to adults who are writing fiction on a larger scale. Reading for research is particularly important for non-fiction and for historical novels. I spent hours researching for my recently published novel and it is the one thing that readers mention time and time again, that they learned a great deal from the experience because of the research that went into it. If you particularly enjoy research or are keen on a certain topic area, research won’t feel like hard work, it will be a pleasurable task.

In what ways has your reading experience informed your writing? Can you think of any good books you have read which have fired up your writing embers? Share your thoughts.

The Bench Cover Image

Take Me to the Castle Cover Image

Posted in General | Tagged , , , , , , | 8 Comments